Essay on William J. Brennan, Jr. Biography is published for informational purposes only. The free papers are not written by our writers, they are contributed by users, so we are not responsible for the content of this free sample paper. If you want to buy a quality Essay on Essay on William J. Brennan, Jr. Biography at affordable prices please use our essay writing services offered by EssayEmpire.

William Brennan, U.S. Supreme Court justice, was one of the architects of the constitutional revolution that radically changed American life in the second half of the twentieth century. As Chief Justice Earl Warren's right-hand man, Brennan was responsible for crafting majority opinions such as Baker v. Carr, which helped to establish the principle of "one person, one vote" and which Warren always referred to as the most important decision handed down during his momentous tenure on the Court. Brennan, whose politics placed him squarely at the Warren Court's center, was also responsible for crafting majorities for opinions such as the one he wrote in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, which managed to greatly expand the First Amendment while avoiding his more liberal colleagues' wish to make criticism of public officials immune to libel suits. During the Warren years (1953-1969), Brennan was the justice least likely to dissent from the majority's views; but later, during the tenures of Chief Justices Warren Burger and William Rehnquist, he frequently played the role of passionate dissenter, most notably in death penalty cases. Nonetheless, as late as a year before he retired from an increasingly conservative Court, Brennan marshaled a majority in Texas v. Johnson and engineered an opinion that expanded the definition of protected speech. It is no accident that Brennan is remembered not only for the law he made but also for his skills as a coalition builder.

Born in Newark, New Jersey, on April 25, 1906, the son of Irish working-class parents, William Joseph Brennan, Jr., could be said to have inherited the social activism he later exhibited on the high bench. His father worked as coal stoker at a brewery, hard labor that prompted him to become, first, a leader of the local labor union and, later, a reformer as member of the Newark Board of Commissioners. William, Jr., shared many of his father's attitudes, but not--at least not overtly--his father's taste for politics.

After graduating with an advanced business degree from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, Brennan attended Harvard Law School. He practiced law privately for only a short while before commencing a campaign to reform the New Jersey court system. Within a few years, he was sitting on the state Supreme Court bench, where, seemingly anticipating the role he would later play in connection to Earl Warren, Brennan became New Jersey Chief Justice Arthur Vanderbilt's closest associate.

Brennan arrived at the U.S. Supreme Court on October 16, 1956, appointed by President Dwight D. Eisenhower when Congress was in recess. When the Senate reconvened and voted on Brennan's appointment, only one voice was raised against him: that of Joseph McCarthy, who presumably objected not to Brennan's jurisprudence but to the latter's onetime comparison of McCarthy's Communist-hunting tactics with those employed at the Salem witch trials. Later, Eisenhower would come to regret his choice. Asked if he had made any mistakes as president, he responded, "Yes, two, and they are both sitting on the Supreme Court" (qtd. in Abraham, p. 246). Eisenhower grew to dislike Brennan's liberality on the Court almost as much as he disliked Warren's.

And, indeed, Warren and Brennan worked together closely throughout Warren's tenure, meeting together privately to discuss strategies for bringing the other justices around to their view of current cases before each weekly judicial conference. Warren valued Brennan not only for his ability to parse and articulate a legal argument but also for his persuasiveness. Achieving unanimity--or, barring that, the clearest majority possible--was of the utmost importance to Warren, who sought to make his Court's precedents stick. Brennan was, in every sense, Warren's ambassador. During the subsequent tenures of Chief Justices Burger and Rehnquist (respectively, 1969-1986 and 1986-2005), the politics of the Court shifted steadily rightward, and Brennan eventually lost both his leadership role and some of his optimism. Increasingly, he found himself in the minority, and whereas he had written few dissents during the Warren years, after 1969 the number rose steadily.

Brennan's closest associate became Thurgood Marshall, one of the few other remaining members of the liberal voting bloc that had been responsible for so many of the Warren Court's momentous decisions. Brennan and Marshall frequently voted together--and they always voted together against imposing the death penalty, which both men believed to be inherently unconstitutional. In later years Brennan was, nonetheless, still an influential figure, drafting important opinions for the Court on gender discrimination and affirmative action, as well as First Amendment freedoms. He retired on July 20, 1990, having written 1,360 opinions, a number bested only by his fellow Warren Court liberal, William O. Douglas.

During more than three decades on the high bench, William J. Brennan, Jr., was responsible for some of the most significant decisions the Court has ever known. The vast majority of these fall under the rubric of expansion of individual liberties. Baker v. Carr, for example, is known as the case that jump-started the movement toward social equality by, as it were, enfranchising the franchise with the principle of "one person, one vote." New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, by constraining libel laws, managed to extend both the First Amendment and civil rights. Craig v. Boren had an analogous effect on equal protection and gender equality. And in Texas v. Johnson, one of the last opinions he would write, Brennan returned to the familiar territory of the First Amendment, shoring up this perpetual bulwark of our democracy by supporting those who choose to attack the flag--our most cherished symbol of liberty.

References:

1. Abraham, Henry J. Justices and Presidents: A Political History of Appointments to the Supreme Court. New York: Oxford University Press, 1974.

2. Clark, Hunter R. Justice Brennan: The Great Conciliator. Secaucus, N.J.: Carol Publishing Group, 1995.

3. Eisler, Kim Isaac. A Justice for All: William J. Brennan, Jr., and the Decisions That Transformed America. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993.

4. Goldman, Roger, and David Gallen. William J. Brennan, Jr.: Freedom First. New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1994.

5. Hasen, Richard. The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore. New York: New York University Press, 2006.

6. Rosenkranz, E. Joshua, and Bernard Schwartz, eds. Reason and Passion: Justice Brennan's Enduring Influence. New York: W. W. Norton, 1997.

7. Marion, David E. The Jurisprudence of Justice: William J. Brennan, Jr.: The Law and Politics of a "Libertarian Dignity" Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997.

8. Michelman, Frank I. Brennan and Democracy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999.

9. Woodward, Bob, and Scott Armstrong. The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court New York: Simon & Schuster, 1979.

Free essays are not written to satisfy your specific instructions. You can order a term paper, research paper or custom TOPIC at our site which offers professional essay writing services. Get your high quality custom paper at relatively cheap prices. EssayEmpire is the best solution for those who seek help in essay writing related to TOPIC and other relevant topics.