Advertising Essay

Cheap Custom Writing Service

This Advertising Essay example is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need a custom essay or research paper on this topic, please use our writing services. offers reliable custom essay writing services that can help you to receive high grades and impress your professors with the quality of each essay or research paper you hand in.

Advertising has been defined as “any paid form of non personal communication about an organization, product,  service, or idea by an identified sponsor” (Alexander 1965, 9). Advertising intrudes into our lives and is not always welcome. Some scholars suspect that we are being manipulated by dark arts. Today, an estimated US$ 500 billion is spent worldwide on local, national, and international advertising.


Since the dawn of time, sellers have been seeking to attract  attention  and  present  their  wares in ways that encourage sales. A contemporary classified ad for a second-hand  bicycle is substantively the  same as an  ad  for  a Roman  chariot 2,000 years ago. Media have changed, notably broadcast and digital, and our understanding  of how ads work has changed, but advertising itself has changed much less. Advertising has always provided information, used emotional appeals to sell to us, and reminded  us. But it used to be less pervasive than it is today because of the limited media and  the  limited number  of goods then available for trading.

Advertising agencies have existed since at least the eighteenth century but their formal standing as experts dates from the mid-nineteenth century in developed markets and the late twentieth century in the late developers. The importance  of small start-up agencies is as great as it ever was but globalization has also promoted  mergers of the larger, more mature,  agencies into perhaps half a dozen multinationals.  This is significant because with  classic packaged goods, or  fast-moving consumer goods, advertisers have shifted budgets from advertising to promotions, but the slack has mostly been taken up by new advertisers such as financial services and government. As a share of world GDP, however, advertising appears to have grown (

Measurement  techniques have  become  more sophisticated partly in response to advertiser demands to see quantified results and partly as advertisers and their agencies have taken a more scientific approach to understanding how advertising works. Content  has increased in  variety with more entertainment and appeals to emotion but this has largely been driven by the wish to exploit new media. Perceptions of different advertising styles may be seen as evolutionary by those involved but the changes in style also reflect the fashion cycles that are necessary to maintain the appearance of novelty (McDonald & Scott 2007).

The Advertiser’s Perspective

In recent years, the brief from client to agency setting out requirements has been increasingly formalized. The briefing itself is an interactive process as the agency brings its own experience and  negotiating skills, typically, to making the goals easier to  achieve and  the  budget bigger. What should emerge from the process is a clear identification   of  the  target  market   and   the changes the advertising should achieve. The brief should not describe the means, i.e., what the ad should contain, but the end, i.e., challenge the agency with what the campaign should achieve.

Ads work  in  two  stages: they  change  brand equity (what is in  consumer  heads) and  brand equity, at a later date, changes consumer behavior. That may imply that the goals for the ad campaign should be set by changes in brand equity (intermediate) metrics and the budget made available in those terms. In practice few advertisers formalize brand equity measurement in that way. Furthermore the correlation between intermediate and behavioral metrics can be poor so clients typically prefer the latter, e.g., sales or penetration or profit, where advertising can measurably deliver those goals.

Media neutral planning (MNP; Saunders 2004) as well as  integrated marketing communications  (IMC; Schultz 1993) share the  idea that communications should be planned from the consumer’s perspective. The target market should ultimately determine  the relevant media both in  terms  of readership  and  in  providing  the appropriate  context for the  copy. Thus, media considerations  are  less driven  by  reach  (how many people see it), frequency, or the cost per 1,000 readers (or viewers) than the relevance of the media and whether, in that context, the message is likely to work.

This leads to the question of how the ads might be expected to work. For a new product or brand, the primary aim is, typically, achieving awareness. Thereafter, advertising works mostly through two approaches, broadly classified as either active or central processing, involving argument and logic, or passive peripheral processing, which relies on cues.

Pre-testing is a contentious topic. Predictiveness is dubious and ads are rarely pre-tested against the particular goals for the campaign. Post-campaign assessment, on the other hand, is not contentious in principle although there are various competing approaches. Post-campaign assessment usually takes the form of ‘tracking,’ i.e., the key brand equity metrics are consistently monitored  over time, for example, on a monthly basis (for a summary see White 2005).

The Consumer’s Perspective

From as early as the first half of the nineteenth century, there has been public ambivalence toward  advertising. It  is seen as manipulative, intrusive, and seeking to persuade us to buy what we do not need (such as lottery tickets) or to buy what is bad for us (such as alcohol, tobacco, or fatty foods). Because brand leaders are typically more expensive than their private label equivalents, some argue that advertising causes us to pay more than we should.

On the other  hand, advertising pays for the media we enjoy such as television, newspapers, and the internet.  Quite often we enjoy the ads themselves which  enter  into  general  parlance such as ‘it does what it says on the tin’.

Finally we should note that the consumer’s attitude towards advertising is driven by television advertising rather than all media (Jin & Lutz 2013).

The Social Perspective

Opponents of advertising claim that it commercializes culture, undermines values, and leads to less happiness as society is reminded of what it cannot  afford. Supporters argue that advertising merely mirrors society as it is. They see it as a necessary part of a healthy market and contend that it has contributed to the growth of GDP and  widespread prosperity  (O’guinn & Faber 1991).

Advertising in itself is neither good nor bad, but it can be good or bad in the way it is used. Accordingly, most countries have developed regulation as a means to control ‘bad,’ or potentially harmful, advertising while allowing ‘good’ advertising a reasonably free rein. Regulation, much of it  self-regulation, has  grown  rapidly since the 1960s to meet increasing cultural sensitivities but also to dissuade governments from interfering. Self-regulation is seen as being more flexible and responsive to consumer protection than legal rules, but governmental wish to control the industry  has led to ‘co-regulation,’ i.e., government retaining the right to intervene when they deem it necessary.


  1. Alexander, R. S. (ed.) (1965). Marketing definitions. Chicago: American Marketing Organization.
  2. Ambler, T. & Roberts, J. H. (2006). Beware the silver metric: Marketing performance measurement has to be multidimensional.  Marketing  Science Institute, Report 06–113. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
  3. Jin, h. & Lutz, R. J. (2013). The  Typicality and Accessibility of Consumer Attitudes Toward Television Advertising: Implications  for  the  Measurement  of Attitudes Toward Advertising in General. Journal of Advertising 42(4), 343-357.
  4. McDonald, & Scott, J. (2007). Brief history  of advertising. In G. J. Tellis & T. Ambler (eds.), The Sage handbook  of  advertising. Thousand  Oaks, CA: Sage.
  5. Nerlove, M. & Arrow, K. (1962). optimal advertising policy under dynamic    Economica, 29, May, 129–142.
  6. O’guinn, T. C. & Faber, R. J. (1991). Mass communication theory and research. In H. H. Kassarjian & T. S. Robertson (eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior theory and research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prenticehall, pp. 349–400.
  7. Saunders, J. (2004). Communications challenge: A practical guide to media neutral planning. London: Account Planning Group.
  8. Schultz, D. E. (1993). integrated marketing communications: Maybe definition is in the point of view. Marketing News, January 18, 17.
  9. White, R. (2005). Tracking ads and communications. Admap, 460, 12–15.

See also:


Always on-time


100% Confidentiality
Special offer! Get discount 10% for the first order. Promo code: cd1a428655